Comparison between the theory of evolution and the theory of creation

Introduction to evolution

Interdisciplinary discussion has become difficult and is neglected, assertions to the contrary notwithstanding. Evolutionists cannot explain polystrates at all, and they resort to theories of "overthrusting" to explain how older strata ends up over newer strata, even though such a phenomenon has never been observed, and even though they cannot explain where the geologic forces should originate.

One of the important things we must look for is evidence that a piece of spoken or written testimony really did come from the creator. No man was there to both observe and document the formation of the major geological features of the earth.

Ina Neanderthal was discovered to have lived in a cave after a modern man had inhabited the cave some have alleged that this was an "intrusive burial".

Inan almost complete skeleton was found. A Final Comment Since this writer spent many years in scientific research, I know how painful it is to propose a theory and then discover evidence disproving the theory.

Amino acids are molecules that have a three-dimensional geometry. What a brilliant way to show how ID makes no sense at all. Things that are caused by processes that we observe to be "random" we associate with increasing disorder, not more complex design.

In fact, within the laws of probabilities and statistics we should not expect order and selection to be the result of "random" processes.

No experiment has been performed to show that a supernatural phenomenon cannot occur. The weakness of the evolution theory gives rise to a number of practitioners of the religious sector to perceive another idea about the beginning of the Earth and human life, the Creation theory.

The burden of proof is on them, however, to show that a particular beneficial trait was a mutation to begin with. I doubt if it is possible to justify them by any higher sanction than our moral code itself, which is indeed only another name for our conception of justice.

Stratified layers of rock containing fossils There is no basis for assuming uniform geological processes and ruling out catastrophic events.

The same thing could happen to a tree. It was Hoyle who originally coined the term Big Bang, in a radio broadcast in But all social sciences can profit from the attempt to make the knowledge of other disciplines bear fruit for their own work through the techniques of systems thinking.

Since matter and antimatter are equivalent in all respects but that of electromagnetic charge oppositeness, any force [the Big Bang] that would create one should have to create the other, and the universe should be made of equal quantities of each.

Perhaps the answer lies in the fact that due to the vast space of the universe, the presence of intelligent life is so short, by cosmic standards, the overlap is just negligible.

I say, "Look, millions of people have flipped coins throughout history. Anything is good enough for the evolutionist, and nothing is good enough for the creationist.

And in my theory, the gods are even more amazing. Resource list A list of primary source documents cited by the secondary sources is given for footnoted points in essays We have copies of all of the web references in case any of them are removed from their web sites. Since less variation means less of an ability for the new species to collectively adapt to its environment, then we should expect a greater likelihood of extinction not evolution to occur if this process of speciation is taken to its limit.

It is therefore space itself that stretched to its present size. If so, our institutions do not correspond.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Evolutionary taxonomy is an effort based purely upon speculation and prior acceptance of the evolution model. Perhaps there might also have existed some degenerate or diseased descendants of modern man. The animals now fossilized were as complex back then as they are today.

How did it start?

It is this kind of function which is usually at the centre of political debate. All this happened orders of magnitude faster than what is now assumed, yielding a single "ice age. Religious doctrines are all dead ends. EVOLUTION TRENDS The "INFORMATION AGE" & its Evolution into the "Holographic Age" Challenges & Realistic Goals For Survival & Creating A Desirable Future.

Articles home page Creation vs. Evolution 0. Introduction and table of contents The following is an organized presentation on the creation vs. evolution controversy.

Creation Vs. Evolution

The Theory of Evolution, however, states that all life forms today have come from a common ancestor millions of years ago. More specifically, it states that humans and primates have a. Misconceptions about evolutionary theory and processes. MISCONCEPTION: Evolution is a theory about the origin of life.

CORRECTION: Evolutionary theory does encompass ideas and evidence regarding life's origins (e.g., whether or not it happened near a deep-sea vent, which organic molecules came first, etc.), but this is not the central focus of evolutionary theory. Creationism versus Evolution comparison chart; Creationism Evolution; Introduction: Creationism is the belief that life, the Earth, and the universe are the creation of a supernatural being.

The belief is also called intelligent design. Evolution is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations. Novice qualitative researchers are often unsure regarding the analysis of their data and, where grounded theory is chosen, they may be uncertain regarding the differences that now exist between the approaches of Glaser and Strauss, who together first described the method.

Comparison between the theory of evolution and the theory of creation
Rated 4/5 based on 33 review
Creation Vs. Evolution